Obama’s Hubris is His Undoing

Obama’s Hubris is His Undoing

Historians will have the rest of the century to unravel the mess that is the Barack Obama presidency. While they can explore these years of foreign policy disaster and domestic malaise at leisure, the rest of us have 29 more months to see just how awful things can get before he slides off to a lucrative retirement. But those who want to start the post-mortem on this historic presidency would do well to read Jackson Diehl’s most recent Washington Post column in which he identifies Obama’s hubris as the key element in his undoing.

As our Pete Wehner wrote earlier today, the president’s reactions to what even Chuck Hagel, his less-than-brilliant secretary of defense, has rightly called a world that is “exploding all over” by blaming it all on forces that he is powerless to control. As Pete correctly pointed out, no one is arguing that the president of the United States is all-powerful and has the capacity to fix everything in the world that is out of order. But the problem is not so much the steep odds against which the administration is currently struggling, as its utter incapacity to look honestly at the mistakes it has made in the past five and half years and to come to the conclusion that sometimes you’ve got to change course in order to avoid catastrophes.

As has been pointed out several times here at COMMENTARY in the last month and is again highlighted by Diehl in his column, Obama’s efforts to absolve himself of all responsibility for the collapse in Iraq is completely disingenuous. The man who spent the last few years bragging about how he “ended the war in Iraq” now professes to have no responsibility for the fact that the U.S. pulled out all of its troops from the conflict.

Nor is he willing to second guess his dithering over intervention in Syria. The administration spent the last week pushing back hard against Hillary Clinton’s correct, if transparently insincere, criticisms of the administration in which she served, for having stood by and watched helplessly there instead of taking the limited actions that might well have prevented much of that country — and much of Iraq — from falling into the hands of ISIS terrorists.

The same lack of honesty characterizes the administration’s approach to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and the nuclear negotiations with Iran, two topics that Diehl chose not to highlight in his piece.

Obama wasted much of his first term pointlessly quarreling with Israel’s government and then resumed that feud this year after an intermission for a re-election year Jewish charm offensive. This distancing from Israel and the reckless pursuit of an agreement when none was possible helped set up this summer’s fighting. The result is not only an alliance that is at its low point since the presidency of the elder George Bush but a situation in which the U.S. now finds itself pushing the Israelis to make concessions to Hamas as well as the Palestinian Authority, a state of affairs that guarantees more fighting in the future and a further diminishment of U.S. interests in the region.

On Iran, Obama wasted years on feckless engagement efforts before finally accepting the need for tough sanctions on that nation to stop its nuclear threat. But the president tossed the advantage he worked so hard to build by foolishly pursuing détente with Tehran and loosening sanctions just at the moment when the Iranians looked to be in trouble.

On both the Palestinian and the Iranian front, an improvement in the current grim prospects for U.S. strategy is not impossible. But, as with the situation in Iraq, it will require the kind of grim soul-searching that, as Diehl points out, George W. Bush underwent in 2006 before changing both strategy and personnel in order to pursue the surge that changed the course of the Iraq War. Sadly, Obama threw away the victory he inherited from Bush. If he is to recover in this final two years in office the way Bush did, it will require the same sort of honesty and introspection.

But, unfortunately, that seems to be exactly the qualities that are absent from this otherwise brilliant politician. Obama is a great campaigner — a talent that is still on display every time he takes to the road to blame Republicans for the problems he created — and is still personally liked by much of the electorate (even if his charms are largely lost on conservative critics such as myself). But he seems incapable of ever admitting error, especially on big issues. At the heart of this problem is a self-regard and a contempt for critics that is so great that it renders him incapable of focusing his otherwise formidable intellect on the shortcomings in his own thinking or challenging the premises on which he has based his policies.

Saying you’re wrong is not easy for any of us and has to be especially hard for a man who has been celebrated as a groundbreaking transformational figure in our history. But that is exactly what is required if the exploding world that Obama has helped set in motion is to be kept from careening even further out of control before his presidency ends. The president may think he’s just having an unlucky streak that he can’t do a thing about. While it is true that America’s options are now limited (largely due to his mistakes) in Syria and Iraq, there is plenty he can do to prevent things from getting worse there. It is also largely up to him whether Iran gets a nuclear weapon or Hamas is able to launch yet another war in the near future rather than being isolated. But in order to do the right things on these fronts, he will have to first admit that his previous decisions were wrong. Until he shed the hubris that prevents him from doing so, it will be impossible.

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of The Constitutional Conservatives to add comments!

Join The Constitutional Conservatives


Note to contributors:
It appears text is not spacing properly please "double space" your paragraphs- I apologize for this inconvenience 12/22/20

Please upload your posts in 12 px font size and don't forget your tags.  Tags in an article are INCREDIBLY important!    They're the internets way of locating your post in a search.


Without tags - your article is INVISIBLE on the web!


Use keywords found within your post and/or use phrases which a person would enter *IF* they were searching your topic.


  • Minimum 400 characters (that's only a few sentences guys). 
  • No more than 20% of an Editorial entry may be copy/pasted from another site although back links to research are encouraged. 
  • All Editorial entries will require Editor approval. 
  • Once published, increase your presence and readership by posting your entry directly to Twitter, Facebook, Google+.
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:Saul Alinsky wrote the book "Rules for Radicals". A book that Hilary Clinton based…
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
Now They're on Record: Democrats Overwhelmingly Vote to Allow Abortion up to Birth By Brandon…
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:This story has a misleading title: Number one, Governor Abbott does not own the…
Apr 30
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
Is The Culture War Really A Class War?BY REALCLEARWIRE APRIL 28, 2022 AT 10:04AMBy Batya…
Apr 29
justfolk left a comment on Prayer Circle
"Thank you🇺🇸💖🙏🏻"
Apr 27
Susan Nielsen left a comment on Prayer Circle
"No joining necessary...."
Apr 26
justfolk left a comment on Prayer Circle
"Wish to join group but no join button…
Apr 25
justfolk replied to Susan Nielsen's discussion Hello Californians in California
"Wow, no takers!  Suzie just got back on and saw this. Coffee and a chat sounds great to me.…"
Apr 25
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:This numbskull really thinks that Conservatives are turning people against Disney.…
Apr 2
Norma J. Sears replied to Susan Nielsen's discussion TRUST your Gut
"Yes, yes and yes.  I trusted my gut and reused to give in and stated it was my god-given right not…"
Mar 28
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:I believe that Senator Marsh Blackburn missed a perfect opportunity when she…
Mar 26
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
Why Should Deplorables Fight for Those Who Hate Them?By J.B. ShurkWhat happens when a self-anointed…
Mar 8
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
Why should Deplorables Fight for Those Who Hate Them?By J.B. Shurk What happens when a…
Mar 8
Susan Nielsen posted a discussion
Trust Your Gut!
By Susan Nielsen
Many of you knew that gut feeling you had was right on, but…
Mar 5
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:Sorry General Clark, but I believe you've got your head stuffed so far up your own…
Mar 3
Andrew Aguirre is now a member of The Constitutional Conservatives
Feb 27