By  Daniel John Sobieski


As 2020 election fraud deniers react hysterically to Georgia’s election reforms, we should remember the grave and proud Iraqi women who voted for the first tine after the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein was deposed. They risked their lives to vote in person and proudly held up their purple fingers marked with indelible ink to show they had voted and keeping them from voting more than once. No mail-in or absentee ballots for them  And they didn’t need bottled water to vote.

Reciting his caretaker’s talking points, Joe Biden hysterically attacked Georgia’s election reform law bt painting a picture of voters dropped dead from thirst in voting lines, denied food and water by those nasty Republicans tryinf to suppress the votes of minorities. It is a lie parroted by the media, as National Review points out:

Joe Biden, grasping the latest left-wing talking point pushed by Stacey Abrams and her media allies everywhere, has launched a misleading attack on Georgia Senate Bill 202, which Governor Brian Kemp just signed into law.

Here’s what Biden had to say:

It’s an atrocity. The idea, you want any indication, it has nothing to do with fairness, nothing to do with decency. They pass a law saying you can’t provide water for people standing in line, while they’re waiting to vote.  You don’t need anything else to know that this is nothing but punitive, designed to keep people from voting. You can’t provide water for people about to vote? Give me a break.

 Let’s take a look at what S.B. 202 actually says: 

No person shall solicit votes [or] distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to [a voter] … This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit a poll officer…from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to [a voter] waiting in line to vote….

Now, first of all, notice what is not prohibited here. Voters can still bring bottled water or other food or beverages with them to stand on line to vote, as people often do when waiting at Disney World or to buy concert tickets or in other public places where people stand on long lines. Voters can still also, if they like, order food; the bill doesn’t stop the Domino’s Pizza man or the local hot dog cart or taco truck from doing business. And if you feel impelled to donate food and drink to voters, you can still do that, too; you just have to give it to the poll workers so they can put it out for general use. The president’s claim that “You can’t provide water for people about to vote” is just false. What you cannot do under the new Georgia law is deploy people in National Rifle Association t-shirts and MAGA hats to hand out free Koch-brothers-financed, Federalist Society–branded pizza to voters.

What the law actually does is out an end to many of the shenanigans that occurred in the 2020 election, particularly with absentee ballots and signature verification. As reports:

Heritage Action, which was vocally in favor of the legislation, outlines some of the bills provisions, including:

  • Protecting absentee voting by requiring voter ID, not automatically sending request forms or ballots to all registered voters, printing ballots on security paper so they can be authenticated, prohibiting ballot trafficking by political operatives, and strengthening supervision of absentee ballot drop boxes.
  • Promoting the integrity of the election process by prohibiting private funding of election officials and government agencies.
  • Increasing the accuracy of voter registration lists.
  • Increasing transparency by allowing election observers complete access to the election process and requiring the ballot-counting to continue without pause until all votes have been tabulated.

Enough is enough. Election after election mysterious boxes and suitcases full of Democrat ballots show up in counties run by Democrat election supervisors to benefit Democrat candidates who, once they steal their opponent’s election night victory, will join the chorus warning of Russian interference in our elections. Last time I checked, there were no Russian election officials in Palm Beach or Broward counties in Florida.


Democrats have long pushed for voting ease at the expense of voting integrity, pushing measures from voting by mail, to Motor Voter laws, to same-day registration while opposing voter ID laws which requires people to show up on election day with proof they are who they say they are. They claim Voter ID laws are designed to disenfranchise voters. So does the sudden appearance of mystery ballots days, even weeks, after elections without a documented  chain of custody or certainty that other ballots weren’t destroyed or that the ballots found were cast by real, live American citizens.

One is reminded of the classic case of an arguably close stolen election, the 1960 presidential contest between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon and the vote early, vote often city of Chicago where voting was such a passion that death was no impediment to that civic duty:

At some point on election night Robert Kennedy, the candidate's brother and campaign manager, was counting electoral votes. Information was coming in quickly through the television networks but there was not much information on Illinois, a very large state. Most of Illinois was rural and traditionally Republican and the state's largest city, Chicago (then the second largest city in the country as I recall), was and remains heavily Democratic. The mayor of Chicago at the time was Richard J Daley, reputedly a powerful political boss. There was no information at all from Chicago and its suburbs at this point and it was coming in scattered from the prairie regions. Robert Kennedy wanted to know how many votes Mayor Daley and his people had counted in Chicago.

Daley was harried, dealing with precincts all over the city, trying to compile and report them at an alarming rate. His answer to Robert Kennedy's question on vote totals was reputedly, "How many votes do you need?" The campaign manager told the Mayor he'd get back to him and Mayor Daley called with a vote total about an hour later, shortly before Illinois' heavily Democratic total was reported on the three major television networks.

One could almost hear Democrat operatives and election officials on election night asking the same question – not asking how many votes were cast and for which candidate but how many votes does the Democrat candidate need? As in the race that put Al Franken in the Senate, recounts and lawsuits will inevitably continue until the Democrat takes the lead and then the counting will stop with nary a protest from the legacy media or the Russians.

Take the little noticed flip of a Republican congressional seat in New Mexico in 2018, a preview of 2020, after a supposed election night victory was announced by local and national media for the GOP contender. This was the announcement by ABC:

Wednesday 2:18 a.m. EST -- Republican Yvette Herrell has defeated Democrat Xochitl Torres Small in New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District, ABC News can project. Herrell is the first woman to represent the district.

Not so fast. Before the echoes of that announcement had faded, missing ballots suddenly were repeatedly found, just enough to flip the results to the Democrat. Amazingly missing ballots are seemingly never found that give the lead to or increase it for the Republican. Herrell is not conceding the race:

In an interview on Fox News, Herrell told Judge Jeanine Pirro that after multiple media outlets called the race for her on Election Night, the secretary of state's office called her and said, "they had magically found 4,000 ballots that had not been counted."

Herrell said, about an hour later, the secretary state's office called again and said they found another 4,000 ballots.


That second batch of 4,000 was enough to flip the election to the Democrat. As Mayor Daley might say, his voice rising from a cemetery precinct, just tell me how many votes do you need? Or as Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin once reportedly observed, “The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”

Things like motor voter, absentee ballots and early voting are a plague on our electoral integrity even the Russians couldn’t dream up. Early voting is an excuse for laziness that doesn’t allow a voter to change their mind. Early voters can move to another jurisdiction or even be dead on election day. Motor voter is problematic in states that hand licenses out to illegal aliens who then can drive to the polls and vote, disenfranchising American citizens. Provisional ballots make no sense. If you can’t properly register by election day, don’t bother to show up. It is not that hard. Put down your cell phone, register, and wait for the next election. Mail in ballots are invitations to fraud,  plagued with signatures that don’t match and ballots denied depending on the election judge’s finite wisdom or political rejudice.

Just what is so hard about requiring a voter to physically show up on election day with an ID that proves they are alive, an American citizen, and who they say they are?

Photo IDs are required to board an airplane of Amtrak train, open a bank account, buy liquor, cash  checks, enter a federal building, and for a multitude of daily activities. Consider this bit of irony. When Eric Holder went to Texas to denounce the voter ID laws of that and other states, each person entering the LBJ Library where he spoke were required to present their photo IDs in order to be allowed in to hear the speech..      

The empirical evidence shows that voter ID laws do not suppress minority voting. In Georgia, black voter turnout for the 2006 midterm elections was 42.9 percent. After Georgia passed its photo ID, black turnout in the 2010 midterm rose to 50.4 percent. Black voter turnout also rose in Indiana and Mississippi after enacting their voter ID laws.

As Investors Business Daily noted in 2014, dead voters casting votes, illegal aliens voting, and people being registered to vote in multiple states is a common and documented occurrence:

The fact that many people will do anything to get out of jury duty has exposed massive fraudulent voting in Frederick County, Md., that may have been going on for years. Illegal aliens who stated they were noncitizens on jury duty forms were found to have cast votes in elections.

The Virginia Voters Alliance (VVA) cross-checked jury duty forms with individual voting records and found that hundreds of voters in that one Maryland county cast votes after reporting they were noncitizens. One in seven Maryland residents are noncitizens, so extrapolating the number of possibly illegal votes cast in recent elections over the entire state hints at possible election-changing fraud.

Maryland is one of many states that in the process of making it easier to vote has also made vote fraud easier to commit. Maryland both issues driver's licenses to illegal aliens and has a Motor Voter law that allows that license to be used to register and vote.

The VVA filed suit Friday in U.S. District Court in Maryland asserting that individuals who opted out of jury duty as noncitizens have been able to cast votes in at least three Maryland elections.

Based on the number of these unqualified voters in Frederick County, it is estimated that up to 7% of Maryland's registered voters could be illegal immigrants, enough to swing elections.

"Their continued appearance on these lists makes it nearly impossible for Maryland law to prevent these declared noncitizens from casting votes in elections and significantly affecting the integrity and outcomes of overall electoral processes," said VVA President Reagan George.

As we noted earlier, when the VVA cross-checked voter rolls in Virginia and Maryland, it announced that it had turned up 44,000 people registered to vote in both states at the same time. The group also identified 31,000 dead voters via the Social Security Administration's Death Master File.

Despite the fact that there is no evidence that requiring a Voter ID suppresses voter turnout among minorities, it has been used by the feds from preventing states like the battleground state of North Carolina from working to tighten voting integrity. In another 2014 editorial, IBD noted the fraud that goes on that Democrats ignore:

Last month the Rev. Al Sharpton was the keynote speaker at a rally to kick off the campaign for an Ohio Voters' Bill of Rights state constitutional amendment opposing the use of voter ID.

During the rally, he hugged one Melowese Richardson, the Hamilton County, Ohio, poll worker who was convicted of casting five votes for President Obama, as the audience cheered.

Richardson's actions were treated by the mainstream media and Democrats as a local aberration, not as evidence of widespread voter fraud and certainly not as justification for voting-integrity measures such as requiring a photo ID when registering and voting. …

People move from state to state and voters die, but voting records are not often updated in a timely fashion to reflect those facts, leaving an abundance of seemingly valid voter registrations that can be used to skew the results of close elections. Only recently has cross-checking between states been done.

As Fox News has reported, a law passed last year by the North Carolina legislature required election staff to check information for North Carolina's more than 6.5 million voters against a database containing information for 101 million voters in 28 other states.

That cross-check found listings for 35,570 North Carolina voters whose first names, last names and dates of birth match those of voters who voted in other states.

North Carolina is also one of the states that Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice have sued over a series of laws to ensure fair and honest elections, including one requiring voter ID.

 "We will show that they were discriminatory in both intent and in impact," he said in announcing the North Carolina suit, arguing that "concern of voter fraud is something that is made up" to justify the laws.

Yet he does not explain the support for voter ID by Nelson Mandela in his campaign to end apartheid in South Africa and bring democracy to that country. At one rally, Mandela wore a T-shirt that read: "Get an ID. Register. Vote." In recent Afghan elections, voters proudly displayed their voter ID cards.

Well, it's not made up. Raleigh TV station WRAL reported on its website that 81 residents who died before election day were recorded as casting a ballot.

"We have the 'Walking Dead,' and now we've got the 'Voting Dead,' " said state Sen. Bob Rucho, R-Mecklenburg. "I guess the reason there's no proof of voter fraud is because we weren't looking for it." Well, seek and ye shall find.


A paper in the scholarly journal “Electoral Studies” suggests that as many as 2.8 million illegal aliens voted  in the 2018 election:

How many non-citizen votes were likely cast in 2008? Taking the most conservative estimate (those who both said they voted and cast a verified vote) yields a confidence interval based on sampling error between 0.2% and 2.8% for the portion of non-citizens participating in elections.

Taking the least conservative measure e at least one indicator showed that the respondent voted yields an estimate that between 7.9% and 14.7% percent of non-citizens voted in 2008.

Since the adult noncitizen population of the United States was roughly 19.4 million (CPS, 2011), the number of non-citizen voters (including both uncertainty based on normally distributed sampling error, and the various combinations of verified and reported voting) could range from just over 38,000 at the very minimum to nearly 2.8 million at the maximum”…

Election day voting with a voter ID eliminates mismatched signatures, misplaced, lost in the mail or even  manufactured ballots that show up only when needed to pull a Democrat to victory. State election boards must be allowed to purge voter rolls of dead people or voters that have moved, often winding up registered to vote in multiple jurisdictions. These actions disenfranchise no one except the lazy and the stupid.


         Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.              

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of The Constitutional Conservatives to add comments!

Join The Constitutional Conservatives


Note to contributors:
It appears text is not spacing properly please "double space" your paragraphs- I apologize for this inconvenience 12/22/20

Please upload your posts in 12 px font size and don't forget your tags.  Tags in an article are INCREDIBLY important!    They're the internets way of locating your post in a search.


Without tags - your article is INVISIBLE on the web!


Use keywords found within your post and/or use phrases which a person would enter *IF* they were searching your topic.


  • Minimum 400 characters (that's only a few sentences guys). 
  • No more than 20% of an Editorial entry may be copy/pasted from another site although back links to research are encouraged. 
  • All Editorial entries will require Editor approval. 
  • Once published, increase your presence and readership by posting your entry directly to Twitter, Facebook, Google+.
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:Was the border crisis intentional? Well, of course it was! The entire agenda set…
3 hours ago
Daniel John Sobieski published a
5 hours ago
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
The Unbearable Lightweightness of Kamala HarrisBy J. Robert SmithIt’s faint praise at best to…
Jerome published a
What a great idea. Let's elect more radical Islamists to congress, as if it hasn't been corrupted…
Jerome replied to TONY SALAZAR's discussion Why Obama's So Defensive of Critical Race Theory
"Barack Insane Obama defends CRT because he's a Marxist."
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
Why Obama's So Defensive of Critical Race TheoryBy Jack CashillIn an interview with Anderson Cooper…
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:Gee, I'm sorry Geraldo, but Katie was 100% right. It's obvious that Kammie (the…
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
The End of the Wuhan ScamaramaBy Clarice FeldmanThis week much has been made of the thousands of…
Daniel John Sobieski published a
Jun 6
Daniel John Sobieski published a
Jun 4
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:Faith in America's Federal Justice System!!! Who's D.O.J. is it??? It's certainly…
May 30
Jerome published a
The Way I See It:Seriously, AOC, there is no doubt you definitely require therapy. But, certainly…
May 29
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
Just Who Made Obama's Birth Certificate an Issue?By Jack Cashill  In his controversial new book on…
May 28
Daniel John Sobieski published a
May 27
Jerome published a
 The Way I See It:These two MSNBC idiots are constantly pushing this White Privilege agenda.I can't…
May 27
TONY SALAZAR posted a discussion
No Race Has Ever Done More for Another Race than White Americans Have Done for Black…
May 24